Just a thought, cost should reflect the actual cost of the armor, as it is, a higher "cost" is better. perhaps the label should be changed to "cost effeciency".
--BB
I'm not clear what the problem is with the current table format. Both cost and cost efficiency (the latter in parentheses) are displayed. For example, Ultimate Adamantium costs 42 in Dark Avatar, and buys you 7 mass driver defense, so the cost per unit of defense is 7/42, roughly 0.167. Thus, the table shows "42 (0.167)". You can see that, while it is more expensive than most of the lower tech armors, it is more cost-effective than all of them except for Armor Plating (and Armor Plating requires prohibitive amounts of space). -- Dog of Justice